Zazen is the same thing as God or Buddha. Dogen, the master of transmission, said, "Zazen itself is God." By that he meant that during zazen you are in harmony with the cosmos. In hishiryo consciousness there is no more anything. It is satori consciousness. The self has dropped away and dissolved. It is the consciousness of God. It is God. People have a personal God. We are not separate. There is no duality between God, Buddha, and ourselves.
- Master Deshimaru
According to many sources (for example the scholar Richard Gombrich) the Buddha adapted his teaching to whatever beliefs his audience had, whether they were Tantrics, Vedic fire-worshippers, Naga-worshippers, Yogins, rationalists or skeptics. And in the same way, Deshimaru was adapting his message to the language and concepts of Europe.
During a mondo, I asked Godo Mokuho Guy Mercier what the difference was between practicing Zen and practicing Zen as a Buddhist. Godo Guy responded by saying that we are all Buddhists, that is, all religions are essentially about the same thing, that Buddhism is about the universal, rather than some sectarian dogma. He also argued that the teachings of Jesus really had the same meaning as the teachings of Buddha. He's not the first to say something like this and of course I wonder how far it can be stretched - are the violent, judgemental teachings of the Old Testament the same as Buddhism and what about non-religions?
Universalism
In many ways each religion is quite different - they have mythologies, divine laws and metaphysical schemas that contradict one another. Yet at another level, they seem to intersect at a point that might be called 'mystical experience'. At this point all the major religions seem to be talking about one thing - the transcendence of the individual sense of self. This common ground is so well documented by students of comparative religion that it is almost a cliche. This is known as Universalism and Perennial Philosophy are about . But it's easy to make glib comments about all religions being the same, glossing over the differences - we need to understand the similarities and the differences. And we also need to consider whether its right to give religion a special status and exclude the secular activities in life.
Not all religions include the concept of God of course or even any kind of transcendent absolute. The common ground of religious experience, I would say, is the opening up of the ego to the whole of reality.
The following quotations should give a hint of this.
Hinduism
As a lump of salt, cast in water would dissolve right into the
water...Arising out of these elements (bhuta), into them also one vanishes
away...When his soul is in peace he is in peace, and then his soul is in
God...The Yogi who, lord of his mind, ever prays in this harmony of soul,
attains the peace of Nirvana, the peace supreme that is in me...Thus joy supreme
comes to the Yogi whose heart is still, whose passions are peace, who is pure
from sin, who is one with Brahman, with God.
- Bhagavad Gita
Buddhism
The individual shell in which my personality is so solidly encased explodes at
the moment of satori...my individuality...melts away into something
indescribable, something which is of quite a different order from what I am
accustomed to.
- Franks Davis, The Evidential Force of Religious Experience
Christianity
It was granted to me to perceive in one instant how all things are seen and contained in God. I did not perceive them in their proper form, and nevetheless, and nevertheless the view I had of them was of a sovereign clearness, and has remained vividly impressed upon my soul... This view was so subtle and delicate that the understanding cannot grasp it.
- Terisa of Avil
Teresa's most famous book The Interior Castle describes a person's soul as a multi-chambered castle. Going deeper and deeper into your soul and facing your own fears, self-interests, ego and temptations gradually leads you into a deeper relationship with God. At the very central chamber the soul is at complete peace and complete union with God. This reminds me of the lyrics to Terrible Canyons of Static by God Speed You! Black Emperor.
That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou has sent me. And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one: I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.
- Jesus, John 17: 21 -23
Islam
Adorn me with Thy Unity
Clothe me with thy selfhood
And raise me up to thy Oneness,
So that when Thy creatures see me
They will say we have seen Thee
And thou art That
- Abu Yazid
Fools laud and magnify the mosque, While they strive to oppress holy men of
heart. But the former is mere form, the latter spirit and truth. The only true
mosque is that in the heart of saints. The mosque that is built in the hearts of
the saints Is the place of worship for all, for God dwells there.
- Masnavi, Book 2 Story 13
I pray God the Omnipotent to place us in the ranks of His chosen, among the
number of those He directs to the path of safety; in whom He inspires
fervour lest they forget Him; whom He cleanses from all defilement, that
nothing remain in them except Himself; yea, of those whom He indwells
completely, that they may adore none beside Him.
- Al Ghazzali
Mystical Experiences
According authors such as William Stace, all mystical experiences share the same characteristics:
- unity
- time- spacelessness
- sense of reality = knowledge not subjective
- peace/happiness
- sacredness paradox/logic defied
- ineffability
- loss of sense of self
Only the packaging varies - the framework of ideas, culture, language and mythology in which they are conceived and described. As I see it, to the mystic, God or Brahma or Buddha is everywhere - it's only when a strong attachment is made to the philosophical, theological or mythological framework - the means of communication - that this self-transcendence descends into dogmatism, self-righteousness, bigotry, intolerance and potentially violence. The experience of satori and samadhi are the equivalent of union with God, Brahma etc. Only the metaphysics or dogma varies.
Every major religion has it's mystics and it's universalists, but every religion has its dogmatists and fundamentalists too - just as every polical party has a left wing and a right wing. Perhaps more than any other faith, Bahá'í puts a great deal of emphasis of religious universality. Bahai is a branch of Islam which teaches that all religion is an expression or appreciation of God.
There is no God without duality. Duality being the is and is not.
ReplyDeleteBuddhist ethics is a challenge to live without the not.
I'm sorry, I didn't finish.
ReplyDeleteWhat all religions have in common is they all put the "not" in front of our faces, just in different ways. The "not" is the first cause of suffering appearing as the way out. From my understaning there is no universal religion. They are all universally not the universal and that's how they point to the universal. Some say that Buddha addapted to other religions, but I see it the other way around. They addapted to his teaching and he just showed them the source of theirs. Same with Jesus and Paul for that matter.
It seems that more and more concepts have been added to what Buddha taught that now even Buddhism is redused to one of the choices that are not it as well. Very confusung for folks. I think this would cause Buddha to be sad in one way or another.
I think that maybe the point is to focus on the love from a divine intelligence. I feel that helps me be happy, at least. Focus on the not seems to lead to the Dark Side of emotion.
ReplyDeleteTrepe,
ReplyDeleteI think you're exactly right. For that to be iniversal, though, the devine intelligence has to be empty of love, meaning any concept of love I give to that intelligence will be bound to myself.
Once I create an image of the love of a devine intelligence and project that image into my physical world there is a lack inthat image. This lack causes me to fell like I'm missing something, so now I'm not happy, but want to be. I've flipped perspective. I now want to become happy when originally I was happy already in my being. It is impossible for my human intelligence to fill this lack because it is born of the thought of the devine. Altough the impossible can be transended.
The problem started when I wanted to embody what was an empty concept to begin with. The resuly can't help but clash with you're wanting to embody you're wanting to be happy because they're both born of the thought of devine intelligence. We would then be fight over what is impossible.
I'm of the mind that Buddha is saying that what is impossible can be transended by facing what is impossible. The source of why I want to fill what is empty. This is the Dark side only because I've ignored it.
When I cease to ignore, the possible will come to light.
Sorry so long. Others can say this better.