Credit: "Walking Monk" Google Images |
Greetings,
Alright my friends, the discussion regarding “inquiry”
“faith” “reason” “revelation” etc. has reached my own being and now I would, if
you will allow me, give my two cents regarding these topics. The posts that I
have read have all been very good and, since, the guidelines and top of the
blog states that we ought to search for truth in more “progressive” ways then
we should discuss what sort of ways those actually are!
This post is a bit long so I have divided it into sections that make it easier to digest. I will not be posting this sort of long winded monologue anymore.
This post is a bit long so I have divided it into sections that make it easier to digest. I will not be posting this sort of long winded monologue anymore.
When I walk I discover and discovery is different from
invention or construction. When I walk I wonder and am illuminated, which is
different from a fault going off, or an error that must be troubleshot. When I walk I fall almost every step but still keep moving on and on into the horizon.
When I walk there are millions of things that enter my mind, leave it and are interpreted. I can see some of those things illuminated through my susceptibility to reason, and therefore take form in reasonable thoughts that are aligned logically. But more often than not they are mere musings, statements or half attempted statements, images, icons, emotions that come and stay for a few seconds then make their way out of my mind as the next step and next flower catches my perception.
When I walk I take faith in my next step and in each moment I live. I am partially a blind man, but still see the next step ahead of me. The abyss awaits, I am nearly falling, but I walk into a light in the abyss that moves me forward.
Walking, I believe (and please correct me if I’m wrong) is just milliseconds and just a smidgen-off balance with falling so each step knows the potential catastrophe it goes into but, damn it, it moves on anyway.
When I walk there are millions of things that enter my mind, leave it and are interpreted. I can see some of those things illuminated through my susceptibility to reason, and therefore take form in reasonable thoughts that are aligned logically. But more often than not they are mere musings, statements or half attempted statements, images, icons, emotions that come and stay for a few seconds then make their way out of my mind as the next step and next flower catches my perception.
When I walk I take faith in my next step and in each moment I live. I am partially a blind man, but still see the next step ahead of me. The abyss awaits, I am nearly falling, but I walk into a light in the abyss that moves me forward.
Walking, I believe (and please correct me if I’m wrong) is just milliseconds and just a smidgen-off balance with falling so each step knows the potential catastrophe it goes into but, damn it, it moves on anyway.
When I walk I discover that to live is to have faith.
********************************************************************************
When I sit there are even more thoughts going through my
mind because I am an active person. A sitting
conjures all sorts of mind games and tricks and the taming of those generally
ends up in either mantra recitation or an attempted “emptying” exercise. (I’ve
never told anybody how I meditate before—big moment here guys!)
When I walk I discover that the jumble of information that I
see and intake every moment must be narrowly and beautifully arranged to make
sense.
We are given everything to do such a task. We are given nothing to do such a task. I won’t make contradictions like this without explaining myself anymore: we are given our constant experience to then make sense out of the world with but since most of it is just random emotions, images, and so on it becomes an extremely difficult task. (Yes people, philosophy is hard, but believe me, as just an incipient to it, it’s worth it.)
We are given everything to do such a task. We are given nothing to do such a task. I won’t make contradictions like this without explaining myself anymore: we are given our constant experience to then make sense out of the world with but since most of it is just random emotions, images, and so on it becomes an extremely difficult task. (Yes people, philosophy is hard, but believe me, as just an incipient to it, it’s worth it.)
Each step I take I walk into is Life and Abyss but into it I tread. This is where faith sings its first
canticles. Faith is generally understood as a blind following of a supernatural
(and sometimes natural) belief of the world that incorporates an end, an ideal,
an ethic, eschatology, and so forth regarding the universe. (Eschatology is the
study of the afterlife.)
We progressive Buddhists would not fall under this definition of faith because our mission is to analytically and pragmatically perpetuate the tradition with which we participate.
We progressive Buddhists would not fall under this definition of faith because our mission is to analytically and pragmatically perpetuate the tradition with which we participate.
When I walk I notice the flowers end and the forest begins.
Bees stop buzzing, there is no more purple or fresh meadow smell—there is
darkness, there are fallen branches, moss, fungi, oaks hit by lightning—yet
growing, chipmunks eating the tulips, the tulips eating the sunlight. The world
is a different place and when I walk I notice this new world and my step
quickens. My heart beats faster. My eyes notice each new insect that has never
been seen before—a stick insect? There are no more straight steps of uniformity
and drum line march but a near jog of excitement and terror. A beautifully terrifying
thing. A faithful thing.
********************************************************************************
Despite what anybody tells you, we all have some sort of
belief of this world. Whether that be that it is dead, needs abandonment, and is worthy
of nothing but cockroaches and buckets of spit or the opposite----paradise.
I can prove this to you because “belief” is every step of our thoughts. We think and we believe simultaneously. That brings up all sorts of other questions regarding belief that is best “answered” by mystics. To think that the next moment will be either alive or dead is to see a light in the abyss. This is faith. This is not supernatural but rather ultra-natural. To live is to see a light in the abyss, whether it be black dead light or white alive light.
I can prove this to you because “belief” is every step of our thoughts. We think and we believe simultaneously. That brings up all sorts of other questions regarding belief that is best “answered” by mystics. To think that the next moment will be either alive or dead is to see a light in the abyss. This is faith. This is not supernatural but rather ultra-natural. To live is to see a light in the abyss, whether it be black dead light or white alive light.
When I walk I put my thoughts together and see that even
nature has some uniformity to it—the flower are arranged in such that they attracts
the bumblebees. My thoughts can mimic the flowers, uniform, colorful, produce life and sustain it. I can arrange them into logical scenarios and test them, as bees test each flower.
I experience particulars—of moments in time, of myself, of
my friends, of the trees and bees around. I experience the movement of reality,
I feel it constantly as it perpetuates me through it, sometimes gently, others
through storms.
I experience that this is all transparent; somehow I can gaze and be a player in all of this, be significant in an expanding infinite universe.
My meditation and my walks put together a view of this world tempered by as much discipline and tears as I can make.
I experience that this is all transparent; somehow I can gaze and be a player in all of this, be significant in an expanding infinite universe.
My meditation and my walks put together a view of this world tempered by as much discipline and tears as I can make.
(I take this stuff too seriously and will get emotional about it, not in the dogmatic ‘I’m right sort of way’ but the ‘We need to think about this stuff, it’s extremely important to be sensitive to reality’ sort of way.)
Each moment I take a step I think that this view will see
the tree the same and the tree will see me the same way. It will remain the
same beautiful oak and I will remain the same human walking by, not soil to dig
through (yet). This is an extreme but there are certainly extreme views out
there so I want to justify why this understanding of faith is more healthy and
natural than the belief that the world is still flat. (Let’s not get into
that.)
*********************************************************************************
I think and believe that this moment brings forth the next
in a birthing sort of way—beautiful and disgusting at the same time. Some
believe that change takes place in a more systematic sort of way—Aristotle, for
example had four causes. (Disclaimer; I’m not disagreeing necessarily to
Aristotle just because his view is more systematic, I am stating that change is
often viewed through more scientific and more analyzed data-entry to analyzed
data-entry sort of way). I acknowledge that this second view of the more
systematic way is useful but I stick to my view that depends on silence and
long moments of reflection that scopes both analytic and extremely
“existential” horizons of human participation in this world.
Either of these views will continue on to the next moment
making both of us having to think for a moment about our own views (if we’re
progressive) and then come to terms with an Ultimate.The Ultimate can be shared between
both people, in our particular experiences and world views. This is called pluralism.
I think and believe that my participation in this world is utter paradoxes: making it but also being made by it, being constantly
beautiful and full of joy, being the very scenario of utter chaos and disaster,
flowering then in full bloom, roses, berries and birds, winter and dead crops,
starvation, cold and nightfall. There are Great Tendencies going on that appear
to us through moments of illumination that continue on and we are made by and
continue to make them too! We do not own goodness nor do we own evil. We cannot pass
them on, we are shaped by them and yet, we shape them as time changes, the evil
and good we see changes with it. This is true for anything, says Buddhism.
I think and believe
that this is true even for this view! I must be silent here:
Silence.
Thought: How can I
believe that this paradox filled view is paradoxical thrice in-it-of-itself and
doomed to change and morph and then come to an end?
Silence.
*********************************************************************************
Those experiences, my friends, are mystical experiences of
faith.
I think and believe that each of us, in belief of the Law of the Common Human, of Medicine, of the “Hard” and “Soft” sciences, participates in a tendency that moves this world forward and thus moves them forward. This is how I take my next step. This is an acknowledgement of the abyss ahead but the slight hope that I continue being the light that I keep seeing in that same abyss.
I can’t do this without those views telling me I’m wrong
constantly and also seeing that my views will come to an end or change to
strange ends. Yet I continue on anyway, step by step, being that change that
makes that possible in the first place.
This is a form of faith. Others grasp unto a Tendency such
as Grace, or Love and address it for the rest of the lives, living it out
publically as well as in their own religious personal lives.
Inquiry of this world takes place only when we can continue
believing that there will be a world in our next step to continue studying.
Even if we believe it is utterly dead and only doomed for more and more chaos
and destruction, you can only study it if you believe it will last a little
longer, hold onto at least one more thread, sometimes, the crazy believe they
set up. (Crazy I mean like the Joker sort of crazy. Maniacal to no ends,
believed chaos is freeing somehow yada yada so forth).No matter what view, you
make it and it makes you.
Strong inquiry are the hard sciences, those that focus on
the specific mathematical and physical relations between the events that take
place in this ongoing world. This is extremely difficult (duh) thus utter
respect must be given to those capable of seeing and discovering a world that
has uniformity, that can shared with and is calm, likes stability and is
pleasant (in other words, susceptible to physics, biology, geology, astronomy
etc etc etc etc.)
Inquisitive inquiry are the “soft sciences”, those that
focus on the cultural tendencies, theories and methods regarding our views of
the mind and movement of the mind, the human in culture, culture in nation,
nation to nation relations, economics, sociological investigation, criminal
justice, law, philosophy, religion, religious studies, etc etc etc etc etc.
Inquisitive inquiry is self-knowing. It needed our very strong influence to
become present in the world and requires our continued efforts to remain ethically
valid in this world.
********************************************************************************
When I walk I walk with the tradition of philosophy being
shaped by this post but also all the greats and minors who influence me through
my thoughts and experience of the world. I think and believe philosophy will be
one of those lights shining in the abyss for those who walk with it. This is a
faith that inquiry can take place in the first place because it is believing
this world can be susceptible to inquiry and analyzable data.
This was an example of an Ultimate Trend. The belief that the
world can be studied in the first place, secondly, ought to be studied. The hows and
whys is what most of us are usually so concerned with and is what “popular
faith” is concerned with. I say this to both the Evangelical Christian books I
see constantly living in the Midwest (and being one who was a fundamentalist
Christian) and the antithesis of those statements: all religion is false and
only reason will save us, any “religious” experience can be explained away by a
study of brain functions etc.
These are matters of hows and whys whereas showing concern and the light in the Ultimate Trend (say of Inquiry, or of Justice, Love, Compassion etc) and then spending your life expanding all of the hows and whys etc will a) create a much better world b) expand that person’s religious experience beyond measure.
These are matters of hows and whys whereas showing concern and the light in the Ultimate Trend (say of Inquiry, or of Justice, Love, Compassion etc) and then spending your life expanding all of the hows and whys etc will a) create a much better world b) expand that person’s religious experience beyond measure.
When I walk I step near falling but step regardless. When I
walk discover many things and experience even more. Most go on their ways but
some are here to stay, digging their ways into my being as I move onward. They
stay awhile until some other passerby becomes more of interest to them.
Sometimes they stay with me for a long time. When I walk I take my most
cherished jewels; mercy, love, compassion, philosophy, and when I walk I seldom
leave without one of them forcing me to come once more and walk again.
Best Wishes,
Denis Kurmanov
Points:
Love, Compassion, Justice, Mercy, and those virtues that we
all love, I believe, are connected to reality. This is not an ideal that I just
wish for, it is one I believe it present in the fundamentals of how electrons
move around. Yes, there is chaos and destruction etc but I believe the world to
be alive more than dead.
That being said I don’t believe these things to be
describable in one sentence but mostly displayable by how we live. Music is
often cited as being able to much more validly resemble and conjure the depth
of human emotion than word because it moves with all of our perceptive beings
and not just words on a page.
I make an emotional case for why philosophy is important but
I believe that reaching a good, and admirable view of the world, to
philosophers, to the religious, to the scientists, etc is capable only with
philosophers around.
I argue that faith is constant to life because it is
necessary to living on to the next step. It is shared because a developed faith
is generally a result of plural experience (they don’t have to be as drastic as
one “world faith” meeting another.)
I make the case that all of us working together through our
disciplines brings forth a “general” sometimes good, according to some, or bad,
that perpetuates itself and is apt to change as we continue being a part of it
and it a part of us.
No comments:
Post a Comment